Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Laissez Faire s Faire Leadership Style - 1366 Words

The laissez-faire leadership style can be seen by some as lazy or a type of leadership style where the leader is non-existent. A leader who uses the laissez-faire leadership style is backing away from the traditional idea of a manager or leader, and allowing the employees to make decisions or tackle problems on their own. The laissez-faire leadership style was developed in 1938 in compilation with both autocratic and democratic leadership styles. This leadership style is best when the workforce is made up of very educated and highly skilled individuals who are capable of developing and meeting their own deadlines. At times it can be confusing to employees as to whether their leaders are using the laissez-faire leadership style or if they†¦show more content†¦1). Laissez-faire has the tendency to cater to the wishes of those in which will receive the benefits. If implemented in the wrong organization, laissez-faire can create more issues that it will solve. Laissez-faire has been proven to be at its prime when it is used near the top of organizations or at the executive management level. â€Å"A laissez-faire leadership style delegates decision-making to managers and senior staff with expertise in their fields (Gill, 2015, Laissez-faire leadership pros, para. 1). Within the laissez-faire leadership style, the responsibilities of employee’s actions are completely on the shoulders of the individual employee. They are to report to their supervisors and are held responsible if concerns or issues arise. Laissez-faire encourages employees to increase their motivation in order for them to perform at their highest level. Employees who enjoy freedom and lack of supervision inside an environment that allows for boundary less creativity and innovation flourish in laissez-faire organizations. I do not like the laissez-faire leadership style simply because I believe employees need structure and guidance. I could see where some organizations would benefit fr om this type of leadership style. One way this leadership style would be successful would be if all the employees were highly organized and self-motivated individuals. In my experience, it has been extremely difficult to find said employees and then toShow MoreRelatedThe Leadership Style Of The 21st Century1435 Words   |  6 Pagestheories and new styles of management that are proven to be successful. Even out of the three most common leadership styles, authoritarian, democratic and laissez-faire, the latter, is still considered a fad and too risky. Laissez-faire (french for leave us alone ) is a style where the workers have the decision making power. Even as recent as 2008 Samual C. Certo wrote â€Å"Supervisors are rarely, if ever, able to practice this style of leadership because the nature of the supervisor s job requiresRead MoreLeadership Styles, Employee Turnover Intentions And Counterproductive Work Behaviors Essay907 Words   |  4 PagesIndicators of Negative leaders hip Puni, A., Agyemang, C., Asamoah, E. (2016). Leadership Styles, Employee Turnover Intentions and Counterproductive Work Behaviours. International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, 5(1). Study of 170 respondents within the eight Ghana Banks of turnover intentions and counterproductive behaviors of leadership roles. Discovered laissez-fare leadership individuals were difficult to distinguish from the regular work employees. These leaders seldom suggestRead MoreLeadership And Its Impact On Conflict Resolution927 Words   |  4 Pages â€Å"Leadership is solving problems† (Colin Powell). To better understand the function of leadership and its impact on conflict resolution, we must first define the various roles of leadership and leadership styles. The culture and goals of an organization determine which leadership style fits the organization best. Each leadership style brings its own set of advantages and disadvantages. The leadership styles autocratic, democratic, transformational, and laissez-faire will be defined in order to analyzeRead MoreNursing Leadership Critique Papers1445 Words   |  6 PagesLeadership Critique Paper The textbook, Concepts for Nursing Practice, defines leadership as, â€Å"an interactive process that provides needed guidance and direction.† (Giddens, J., 2013, p.375). Leaders can be informal, a coworker that everyone looks up to, or formal, a manager that has authority that has been given to them (Giddens, J., 2013, p.375). In the case of the nurse manager I have been shadowing, she is a formal leader. The hospital has appointed her as the Surgical Services Nurse ManagerRead MoreLaissez Faire Leadership Is A Hands Off Style Essay1377 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Laissez-faire leadership is a hands-off style characterized by leaders who give the least amount of guidance to their subordinates as possible. These leaders believe that people are at their most creative and efficient when a leader focuses their energy into facilitating an environment where distractions from the outside are mitigated and trust is placed in the employee to solve their problems in the best ways imaginable. The main focus of Inju Yang’s conceptual exploration of laissez-faireRead MoreLeadership Styles And Characteristics Of Leadership1301 Words   |  6 PagesComposition 28 October 2016 Leadership Styles Since the beginning of time, people have led and others have followed. Some ruled by terror and with an iron fist, others peacefully and with a gentle touch. In the average person’s everyday life, we encounter leaders of all different shapes and sizes, with various styles of leadership. There are strengths and weaknesses in each style of leadership, in particular, Democratic, Laissez-Faire, and Autocratic. These styles have overlapping qualities thatRead MoreOrganizational Objectives : Leadership And Management Essay1500 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction 3 Leadership 3 Managemen 3 Organizational objectives 3 What leaders do? 4 Importance of leadership 5 Functions of leadership 5 Leadership vs. Management 5 Leadership is more important than management 6 Personal thought 7 The Hersey-Blanchard situational leadership model 9 Referencing 10 Bibliography 11 â€Æ' Section 1 Introduction Leadership can be described as a method of social influence where one individual can join up the help and support of others in the completion of a common jobRead MoreLaissez Faire And Transformational Leadership Styles Essay1615 Words   |  7 PagesComparatively, Laissez-faire leadership is a great contrast to transactional and transformational leadership styles as defined by Cherry, K. (2016) Laissez-faire leadership, also known as delegative leadership, is a type of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and allow group members to make the decisions. Because of this, researchers have found that this is generally the leadership style that leads to the lowest productivity among group members. Laissez-faire is often characterised by:Read MoreLeadership Is A Good Leader And A Group1630 Words   |  7 PagesLeadership is a process that occurs between a leader and another individual; between the leader and a group. Or between a leader and an organization, on a community, or a society; and that influences others, often by inspiring enlivening, and engaging others to participate in the achievement of goals. Leadership is a subtle art and skill. It is based on inherent qualities of the individual and developed over time, through life events and experiences that range from significant to life altering. LeadershipRead MoreLeadership : A Concise Review Of Leadership Styles1186 Words   |  5 Pages LEADERSHIP REPORT: A concise review of Leadership Styles Brandon Handboy National American University Introduction to Leadership and Quality-MT6255 Angela Jones May 15, 2016 From â€Å"LEADERSHIP REPORT: A concise Review of Leadership Styles† written by Brandon Handboy. According to writer and consultant Peter Drucker, Management is doing things right; leadership is doing the right things. (Robyn Benincasa, 2012) The concept of this report is to summarizes various leadership styles to give

Decentralized Planning in India free essay sample

What is Sectoral Planning and Spatial Planning? When planning is done with a vision and mission to develop a particular sector only then the plan becomes a Setoral Plan. In Setoral Planning excessive concentration is given in economic activities of the metropolitan regions. In India it has benefitted the growth and development of Metro regions but failed to develop the rural and backward regions. In India 70% of the people live in rural area. To develop India the plan should be made to develop the rural regions which should include development plans for all the sectors influencing the region. Since development of one sector leads to impact on several sectors a comprehensive plan is to be prepared considering all the side effects and impacts on the related sectors other than concentrating on a particular sector. This has become a necessity in present scenario for the development of India. This concept of planning leads to the concept of Spatial Planning. Spatial planning refers to the methods and plans used to influence collectively the distribution of people and activities over a region in various scales. It is the consideration of what can and should happen in a region. It investigates the interaction of different policies and practice across regional space, and sets the role of places in a wider context. In Spatial planning, for a region the key influencing sectors are identified and a comprehensive plan is prepared considering all the sectors with proper coordination at various levels of inter-actions. Local development can be achieved thorough spatial planning approach, where in key development sectors are synergically co-ordinated. It is of utmost importance to prepare urban/local development plans with a long-term perspective by targeting various development sectors. Such a spatial plan is classically referred to as a Development Plan or Master Plan. Planning Process in India The planning system in India was more centralized one. In centralized planning, the mechanism remains at the top level only giving importance to compensation or damage control model, it had ignored people’s participation on the whole. Again the Indian planning system was allocative and sectoral in nature. Thus lack of spatial concern in economic planning has resulted in unbalanced development. Therefore based on various discussions held in this regard, efforts were made to decentralize the planning system. The most mportant event in the history of decentralised planning process in India was the promulgation of 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendment Acts on December 22nd 1992 conferring constitutional status to Local Self-Government Institutions (LSGIs) aiming to devolve functional and fiscal powers to the local bodies. Spatial Planning – A Comprehensive Approac h for Local Development India has been engaged in farsighted economic planning since independence. Despite the considerable achievements of the Five Year Plans, very little constructive attention has been paid to the spatial aspects of social and economic change taking place in the country. The functional character of an area is determined by the aggregate functions of all sectors of economy concentrated there. Development of an area, therefore, requires a deliberate coordination of at least a few key sectors which was missing in planning efforts. Need of Spatial Planning National Commission on Urbanization (NCU), 1988 rightly identifies the need of spatial planning. Each investment, whatever is the sector, has a definite physical manifestation and geographical location. Also, it generates a chain of developmental impulses affecting, in several cases, the activities of other sectors and results in a related spatial pattern. For example, the impact of investment in an irrigation project, a large dam (in the agricultural sector), on other sectors can be identified at two stages – (i)During the construction of the Dam and (ii) After completion of the Dam. During the first stage, the reservoir of the dam will cause displacement of village and people. This will demand a resettlement plan for displaced persons and a new spatial order. This work would need the co-ordination of the spatial planning sector (Figure 1. 1). Local development has to be achieved thorough spatial planning approach, where in key development sectors are synergically co-ordinated. The second stage generates three chains of developmental impulses. (i)Generation of hydroelectric power, which needs co-ordination with power sector. (ii)Development of water sports and tourism requiring integration with the tourism sector. (iii) Development of agriculture and this, on one side, increases area under intensive cultivation which will enhance demands for more agricultural inputs like fertilizers and also agricultural implements (e. . Tools and tractors),. This will be resulting in industrial development and, hence co-ordination with the industrial sector. On the other side, the agricultural development increases marketable surplus, requiring ware housing, processing, marketing and roads. This will give rise to the development of processing and marketing centres, which will effect changes in the existing settlement functions, activities , hierarchy and spatial pattern. This in turn would require co-ordination with the spatial planning sector. Development of rural roads will require co-ordination and integration with the transport sector and since land use and settlement pattern are closely related to transportation network, it will further need co-ordination with the spatial planning sector (Figure 1. 1). Similar cases of chains of developmental impulses generated by investments in one sector affecting the activities of other sectors can be identified†. All these factors are taken care of in Spatial Planning. Figure 1. 2 shows an area where a new irrigation project has been commissioned. If we consider the impact of this project on other sectors a number of scenarios may be evolved. Figure 1. 3 shows a possible change in the same area shown in Figure 1. 2 after the completion of the project. This is just one of the possibilities and there may be more scenarios on the line, depending on many factors, including the availability of resources, both natural and human and local needs etc. The assessment of needs and availability of resources can be best done at the grass root level. The Grama sabhas, the working groups and the Committee/ Council of the Local Self Government Institution shall indeed provide the platform. The assessment of local needs and availability of resources in an area combined with impact study of investments on other sectors would enable to take decisions on the type of activities that would be most suitable for the development of the area. Then comes the important part of determining the most suitable locations for these activities, essentially services and nfrastructure facilities, which thoroughly depends on the land use pattern of the area. This further emphasizes the need for spatial planning. It is clear that through planned interventions, one can specifically determine the type of activities and their locations, which are most suitable to develop at any given area at a given point of time so that they can create synergic developmental impulses leading to the formation of a required spatial pattern. If the developmental impulses and ensuing spatial pattern resultant of a particular activity can be foreseen, that indeed will provide the vision or perspective, which is at the moment lacking in our decentralised planning process. Thus local development, one of the major objectives of decentralized planning process, can be attained only when deliberate co-ordination of at least a few key sectors is ensured depending upon the character of the area. This means that, sectoral decentralized planning presently in practice is actually de-concentrated Planning and true decentralized planning can be achieved only through spatial planning approach.